{"id":134136,"date":"2015-07-10T12:31:45","date_gmt":"2015-07-10T11:31:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.recom.link\/zbornik-tranziciona-pravda-i-pomirenje-u-postjugoslovenskim-zemljama-2\/"},"modified":"2015-07-11T02:33:39","modified_gmt":"2015-07-11T01:33:39","slug":"zbornik-tranziciona-pravda-i-pomirenje-u-postjugoslovenskim-zemljama","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.recom.link\/en\/zbornik-tranziciona-pravda-i-pomirenje-u-postjugoslovenskim-zemljama\/","title":{"rendered":"Collection of Texts: Transitional Justice And Reconciliation In Post-Yugoslav Countries"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Naslovna<\/a><\/p>\n

The voices of institutions, religious communities, activists, academics, culture and victims<\/em><\/h3>\n

 <\/p>\n

The Collection of Texts comprises the addresses, discussions and commentaries of representatives of institutions, religious communities, non-governmental organizations, members of the epistemological community and artists about the achievements made and the obstacles encountered in the process of dealing with the past and reconciliation, as well as testimony by victims, participants at the Ninth and Tenth Forums for Transitional Justice in Post-Yugoslav Countries.<\/p>\n

Edited by Svetlana Slap\u0161ak<\/strong> and Nata\u0161a Kandi\u0107<\/strong><\/p>\n

Publisher: Coalition for RECOM, 2015<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Transitional justice and reconciliation<\/h3>\n

in post-Yugoslav countries<\/h3>\n

 <\/p>\n

Table of Contents<\/p>\n

Introduction<\/strong><\/p>\n

Nata\u0161a Kandi\u0107: RECOM is the cornerstone of the attitude to the past<\/p>\n

I Transitional Justice<\/strong><\/p>\n

Niko Grube\u0161i\u0107: The achievements in Bosnia and Herzegovina<\/p>\n

Ton\u010di Stani\u010di\u0107: The victims must talk<\/p>\n

Selim Selimi: Kosovo has made progress<\/p>\n

Dhurata Hoxha: The establishment of the Inter-Ministerial Working Group on Dealing with the Past in Kosovo<\/p>\n

Mary Anne Hennessey: Institutional reforms and reconciliation are the basis of sustainable peace<\/p>\n

Goran \u0160imi\u0107 PhD: The strategy of transitional justice in Bosnia and Herzegovina<\/p>\n

Bojan Glava\u0161evi\u0107: We have drawn a clear distinction between law and justice<\/p>\n

Criminal Justice<\/strong><\/p>\n

Sandra Orlovi\u0107: Serbia has no strategy for prosecuting war crimes<\/p>\n

D\u017eenana Karup Dru\u0161ko: BiH does not implement State Strategy for War Crimes Trials<\/p>\n

Vesna Ter\u0161eli\u010d: The increase of exclusiveness gives rise for concern<\/p>\n

Tea Gorjanc Prelevi\u0107: Not a single indictment on grounds of command responsibility in Montenegro<\/p>\n

Nora Ahmetaj: Priority should be given to trials before the courts of the Republic of Kosovo<\/p>\n

Mirko Klarin: The established and adjudicated facts are the main legacy of the Hague Tribunal<\/p>\n

Denisa Kostovicova PhD: A deliberative and participatory aspect of transitional justice<\/p>\n

Zoran Pusi\u0107: The Hague Tribunal was successful before suddenly coming to a halt<\/p>\n

Gentian Zyberi PhD: Reconciliation through the international criminal courts and tribunals: mission (im)possible?<\/p>\n

Jelena Suboti\u0107 PhD: ”Obstacle bias” in transitional justice scholarship<\/p>\n

Jasna Dragovi\u0107-Soso PhD: The ICTY, in particular, has had very limited success in countering denial of crimes in the post-Yugoslav region<\/p>\n

Kristen Perrin PhD: The implications of in-court discussions on memory<\/p>\n

Katarina Risti\u0107 PhD: The legal narratives about the victims do not reach the community of the perpetrators<\/p>\n

The facts, the shared history<\/strong><\/p>\n

Professor \u017darko Puhovski: Shaming the perpetrators is our concern<\/p>\n

Anna Di Lellio PhD: A great achievement of RECOM: bringing the issue of justice back to the foreground<\/p>\n

Jasna Dragovi\u0107-Soso PhD: Apologies after completing the work on preserving the memory<\/p>\n

Jelena Obradovi\u0107-Wochnik PhD: Achievements of transitional justice in the Post-Yugoslav space<\/p>\n

Sari Wastell PhD: Shared history<\/p>\n

Professor Sergej Flere: History is the main channel for reproducing national myths and legends<\/p>\n

Christian Nielsen PhD: The periods before and after 1991 are interconnected<\/p>\n

Eric Gordy PhD: Limitations and problems in the construction of public memory<\/p>\n

Ivor Sokoli\u0107: The civil society has the potential to spearhead changes in public perceptions<\/p>\n

Adriatik Kelmendi: Recognizing the victims in the case of Kosovo, and Kosovo\u2019s existence<\/p>\n

Igor Cvetkovski: Reparations for wartime victims in the former Yugoslavia<\/p>\n

Professor Zdravko Grebo: The facts, first of all!<\/p>\n

Professor \u017darko Puhovski: From defeat to defeat until the final victory<\/p>\n

II Reconciliation<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u017deljko Kom\u0161i\u0107: One should react, but also reach out a hand of reconciliation<\/p>\n

Mioljub Vitorovi\u0107: Reconciliation is a process<\/p>\n

Engjellushe Morina: Dealing with the past should start first within the framework of a society<\/p>\n

Friar Ivan \u0160ar\u010devi\u0107: We must confront our history, our past<\/p>\n

Husein effendi Smaji\u0107: Religious communities are not responsible for what happened between 1992 and 1996<\/p>\n

Father Vanja Jovanovi\u0107: Reconciliation of the one with the other is a process<\/p>\n

Jakob Finci: Reconciliation through confidence<\/p>\n

Hoxha Rexhep Lushta: Forgiveness and reconciliation are best effected through genuine dialogue and understanding between contending sides<\/p>\n

Christifer Lamont PhD: Accountability and forgiveness are complementary perspectives<\/p>\n

Friar Ivo Markovi\u0107: The idea of reconciliation requires a vision and a step forward<\/p>\n

Nata\u0161a Kandi\u0107: Understanding and interpreting the concept and process of reconciliation<\/p>\n

Hrvoje Klasi\u0107 PhD: The process of reconciliation cannot be viewed separately from the process of understanding<\/p>\n

Professor Zoran Paji\u0107: The inter-generational cycle of “historical reckoning” and violence repeats itself<\/p>\n

Spomenka Hribar PhD: Reconciliation: a process or an ultimate goal?<\/p>\n

Denisa Kostovicova PhD: The reconciliation process primarily takes place through communication<\/p>\n

Neboj\u0161a Petrovi\u0107: It is necessary to humanize the others<\/p>\n

Mirko Klarin: Reconciliation from the point of view of war criminals<\/p>\n

Avila Kilmurray PhD: Northern Ireland – a comparative perspective<\/p>\n

Culture, art and facts<\/strong><\/p>\n

Professor Svetlana Slap\u0161ak: Culture boldly addresses our past<\/p>\n

Professor Svetlana Slap\u0161ak: Spreading the truth: a gadfly ethics<\/p>\n

Dino Mustafi\u0107: Artistic truth should not “relativize”<\/p>\n

Lazar Stojanovi\u0107: If it wants and if it dares, art can win freedom for victims<\/p>\n

Ante Perkovi\u0107: That invisible spiritual space still exists<\/p>\n

Professor Svetlana Slap\u0161ak: The theatre is supposed to upset and cause discomfort<\/p>\n

Alban Ukaj: Raising war topics was not easy<\/p>\n

Maja Izetbegovi\u0107: I have the privilege to speak about my personal experience on stage<\/p>\n

Stevan Bodro\u017ea: Art that questions<\/p>\n

Hazim Begagi\u0107: It is important that we brought the phenomenon of the music school in Zenica back into the public discourse<\/p>\n

Andrej Nosov: A view from the perspective of the other<\/p>\n

Bojan Munjin: <\/em>Protagonists of the Yugoslav tragedy in one place<\/p>\n

Lazar Stojanovi\u0107: A fact may change its value depending on the context<\/p>\n

Vesna Kesi\u0107: Women war victims are held responsible for the fate that befell them<\/p>\n

Ivana Lali\u0107: Protected witnesses are disappointed in state institutions<\/p>\n

Pjer \u017dalica: Victims are the real heroes of war<\/p>\n

III The voices of the victims<\/strong><\/p>\n